Sympatico HS and caps

[the real TOMMY Tutalidge]

Notice how it's still $7.95 a gigabyte and sympatico can change the
contract at any time. What if these people download hundreds of
gigabytes a month and sympatico doubles that $7.95 to $15.90 a gigabyte?

Well, now that the caps are ending for Sympatico customers, what
happens to the DSL reseller out there? Do the 'agreements' between
Bell Nexxia and it's DSL resellers change? Will we still see caps at
(most of) the resellers or will they change too?

[Bob Carrick]

Well, now that the caps are ending for Sympatico customers, what
happens to the DSL reseller out there? Do the 'agreements' between
Bell Nexxia and it's DSL resellers change? Will we still see caps at
(most of) the resellers or will they change too?

The agreements did not change when caps where introduced so there is no
reason why they would change when the caps get removed.

[Walter Dnes]

Top-posting fixed.

Post by Bob Carrick
The agreements did not change when caps where introduced so there
is no reason why they would change when the caps get removed.

Now that's doublethink or Alice in Wonderland or Bob Carrick or ...

Bob's right. The capping/uncapping was a decision by Sympatico, not
by Bellnexxia. Please show why you think they were connected.

[Mac]

It must be the wording - how can agreements not change if caps are used
and then not?

Post by Walter Dnes
Top-posting fixed.

Post by Bob Carrick
The agreements did not change when caps where introduced so there
is no reason why they would change when the caps get removed.

Now that's doublethink or Alice in Wonderland or Bob Carrick or ...

Bob's right. The capping/uncapping was a decision by Sympatico, not
by Bellnexxia. Please show why you think they were connected.
--
Email users are divided into two classes;
1) Those who have effective spam-blocking
2) Those who wish they did

[Bob Carrick]

Post by Mac
It must be the wording - how can agreements not change if caps are
used and then not?

Because as we said that was between SYmpatico and it's customers, not Bell
Nexxia and it's ISPs.

[Tony]

Post by Walter Dnes
Top-posting fixed.

Post by Bob Carrick
The agreements did not change when caps where introduced so there
is no reason why they would change when the caps get removed.

Now that's doublethink or Alice in Wonderland or Bob Carrick or ...

Bob's right. The capping/uncapping was a decision by Sympatico, not
by Bellnexxia. Please show why you think they were connected.

Walter Dnes the last of the last of the originals still around from
can.internet.highspeed

[Tony]

Post by Bob Carrick

Well, now that the caps are ending for Sympatico customers, what
happens to the DSL reseller out there? Do the 'agreements' between
Bell Nexxia and it's DSL resellers change? Will we still see caps at
(most of) the resellers or will they change too?

The agreements did not change when caps where introduced so there is no
reason why they would change when the caps get removed.

Aren't you the same guy wh0 said you'd come back to this newsgroup after
you moved to Boston? Well everyone is still waiting for your return.
We've only been waiting about 19 years.

[Mike Tancsa]

Well, now that the caps are ending for Sympatico customers, what
happens to the DSL reseller out there?

They never had anything to do with Sympatico. Non Sympatico DSL providers
using Bell's copper loops pay $x per month per subscriber and then some
sort of network connection fee for a FastE, OC-3 or GigE connection to
Bell's ATM network. Whether the individual end user used 1byte or
100Gigbytes it doesnt / didnt matter as its not usage based to the ISP.

---Mike
Mike Tancsa (***@sentex.net)
http://www.sentex.net/mike